New User? Sign Up / Forgot Your Password?

Conference Alignment (5/9/10)

By Paul Bessire

Sunday, May 9 at 9:27 PM ET
Collegiate conference realignment always seems to make for great sports radio fodder. Who is going to join the Big Ten (to give it 12 teams)? Should Notre Dame have a conference? Does the Big East deserve to be in the BCS? Does it have too many basketball teams? That's just a start to the popular debates.

And while answering those questions can be compelling and a conversation in which I may join (I could get real nerdy and apply the "traveling salesman" theory or just advocate that the English soccer tiered style), there is a fundamental issue with current conference realignment that transcends those questions and should probably be resolved first.

Athletic directors are glorified fundraisers. Like most in a similar position, the biggest issue ADs have is to find ways generate enough income to cover expenses. Instead of strictly focusing on ways to raise/make the money, ADs can also drastically impact their programs' bottom lines by reducing costs. What are the greatest costs for teams? Travel.

Notre Dame actually has it right (never thought that I would utter that statement). Hockey does too. The best approach to conference realignment is to look at it differently per sport. Focus should be on creating powerful, traditional, intriguing conferences for "revenue-generating" sports (football and basketball). This is where much of our debate exists.

Yet when Cincinnati joins the Big 12 (after Missouri joins the Big Ten), it's not just the basketball and football teams that have to travel to Texas Tech or Colorado (and vice versa). The "non-revenue-generating" sports (everything else) are affected as well. It's not cheap to send the Lady Bearcats soccer team 1,210 miles to Lubbock.

The Lady Bearcats should play the majority of their games against local DI teams and traditional rivals. Xavier, Miami (OH), Dayton, Louisville, Indiana, Ball State, Ohio State, etc. could comprise the conference, rather than Baylor, Iowa State, Oklahoma State, etc. Those matchups would probably of far greater interest to players, coaches and "fans" any way.

Enacting this change would keep costs down from the sports that don't make enough to cover them. And the sports that make the bank and then some could do what they need to do to bring in as much as they can.

It's not a prediction, but it is based on the most important numbers - dollars and sense. Makes all the sense to me.

Print This Article
PREVIOUS ARTICLE
Collegiate Motivation (8/30/10)
NEXT ARTICLE
Horse Racing Webinar (09/25/14)
Want More Tips and Information? Click To Register!

COMMENTS

SEARCH BLOGS

ARCHIVE

Ad

The Predictalator

The Predictalator is the most advanced sports forecasting software available today because it has the ability to account for all of the relevant statistical interactions of the players, coaches, officials, home field advantage and weather in each game.

Picks for every game, including our Play Value Key and Calculator recommendations for optimal bankroll management and access to the Play Analyzer can be purchased in the Shop.

1/26/2014 Highlight: Using the ResultsFinder for the week of January 19th - 25th, one could find that all featured, "normal" or better against-the-spread plays in the NBA and college basketball went 13-7 (65% ATS). The ATS success wasn't limited to just full games picks. All normal or better halftime against-the-spread plays in the NBA and college basketball combined to go 64-48 (57% ATS). In the last three weeks all normal or better against-the-spread halftime picks in college basketball picks have gone 132-94 (58% ATS).

In the previous week's NFL Conference Championship games, the Lock of the Week in the NFL Playoffs (Packers +7.5 at Seattle) easily covered. All-time, in the NFL Playoffs, Locks of the Week are 17-2 (89% ATS), including going 4-1 (80% ATS) in Super Bowls. All playable against-the-spread picks in this NFL postseason are now 6-3 (67% ATS). All-time on the site, all against-the-spread picks in the NFL Playoffs are now 41-13 (76% ATS). Playable prop picks for last Super Bowl went a combined 26-19 (58%), generating a profit of +$847 for a normal $50 player utilizing play value recommendations. Highlighted "normal" plays went 12-7 (63% and +$570), while "2X Green" plays went 4-1 (80% and +$355).

Recommended Features

LOGIN

LATEST ARTICLES

Super Bowl In-Depth Analysis - (Free)
See the in-depth breakdown for Super Bowl XLIX including a Game Summary, Matchup Analysis, Key Players and much more - all for free.

Play Props Pick'em - Win $2,000
Now in its third year, PredictionMachine.com's Prop Pick'em contest brings a unique twist to props, asking you to select answers to game props including two in-game halftime questions. The Top 50 point scorers will share in a prize pool of $7,000 in site credits including $2,000 to the contest winner, while all participants will get a $10 FREE credit.

FIND US ONLINE


Statistical Information Provided by: SportsData © 2012

All registered accounts are subject to our General Terms Of Service. Content is intended for informational purposes only. This is not a gambling website.
Home | The Predictalator | Features | Privacy |  Customer Support |  Media Contact |  Sitemap
© 2010-2014 PredictionMachine.com, LLC. All rights reserved. | Site Designed by Randombell.com